| Workshop: Alternatives to E-waste Export |
Workshop Recommendation for Developing Domestic e-waste Recycling and Reuse Infrastructure
Exporting hazardous computer and electronic waste to developing countries has devastated human health and the environment of recipient nations. This was the topic of discussion at last month's "Alternatives to E-waste Exports" workshop hosted by SVTC and the Basel Action Network (BAN), in which representatives from local government, recycling and environmental groups explored ways to avoid harmful export practices and to support recyclers and reuse activities that create local jobs.
Workshop participants addressed a wide range of issues including technology development, industrial land use and regulatory loop holes and came-up with the following action steps for supporting a US recycling and reuse infrastructure.
- Support a dialogue on computer reuse and refurbishment.
- Acknowledge total cost of municipal recycling collection and consolidation programs.
- Avoid damaging products during recycling collection programs.
- Protect land zoned for industrial use.
- Verify a recipient countries and ability to technically support used computers.
- University R & D Partnerships.
- Develop strategic recycling partnerships.
- Closes state and federal loop-holes for exports.
- Support e-waste recyclers certification programs.
For more information click here
|
Which Company is the Biggest E-Waste Polluter? |

|
The Computer TakeBack Campaign's efforts to persuade Dell, Inc. to support our campaign goals and platform have been successful. But we're not done yet.
Apple, IBM, Panasonic, Philips, Sharp and Sony continue to manufacture electronics that have limited life spans, limited re-use options, and are laden with toxins! We want these companies held accountable for the mountains of e-waste they create. We've laid out our list of grievances, and now we need your help in selecting a target company for our next campaign.
Vote Now!
|
|